Hilton Foundation All articles
Fundraising Guidance

The Volunteer Ledger: A Practical Guide to Match Funding for Small UK Charities

Hilton Foundation
The Volunteer Ledger: A Practical Guide to Match Funding for Small UK Charities

Photo: Philip Halling , CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Volunteer time is one of the most valuable assets a small UK charity holds. It is also one of the easiest to overlook when preparing a grant application. Funders increasingly accept volunteer hours as match funding, but they expect the figures to be credible, consistent and supported by records. For groups without a dedicated finance or fundraising team, the process can feel daunting. It need not be.

What funders mean by match funding

Match funding is the contribution a charity or its partners make towards a project, usually alongside a grant. It can be cash, but it can also be in-kind support: donated equipment, free room hire or volunteer time. Volunteer time is generally treated as an in-kind contribution rather than cash match.

Not every funder accepts volunteer time as match, and those that do may apply conditions. Some want it counted only for specific project activities. Some specify the hourly rate to use. Others may accept volunteer time as a proportion of total project costs but not as a substitute for the charity's own cash contribution. Before counting hours, read the funder's guidance carefully and, if anything is unclear, ask.

Step one: confirm the rules before counting hours

Start with the funder's application guidance. Look for the definition of match funding, any eligible rate for volunteer time and whether volunteer hours can be counted for the same project you are applying to fund. Check whether professional volunteer time, such as legal or accountancy support, is treated differently from general volunteering.

It is also worth confirming whether the funder requires a minimum match contribution or whether volunteer time can form part of a broader package. A short email to the funder's grants team can save hours of unnecessary work later. Record the advice you receive and keep it with your application file.

Step two: set a defensible volunteer rate

If the funder provides a rate, use it. If not, choose a rate you can explain and apply it consistently. A common approach is to use the relevant National Living Wage rate for the year, or a rate published by a recognised volunteering body. Avoid using commercial charge-out rates unless the funder explicitly permits them. A volunteer gardener is not billed at consultant rates.

Document the rate, the date it applies to and the source you used. If your project runs across a financial year and the rate changes, calculate hours at the rate in force for the relevant period, or follow the funder's instruction. Consistency matters more than cleverness.

Step three: keep a simple audit trail

You do not need specialist software. A spreadsheet and a clear process will usually suffice. Record each volunteering session as it happens, not retrospectively at the end of the project. A basic record should include:

Sign-in sheets, rota systems and project diaries can all support the spreadsheet. If volunteers already log hours for safeguarding or insurance purposes, use that data rather than creating a second system. Reconcile the totals monthly so that errors are caught early. Keep the records for as long as the funder requires, and store personal data in line with UK data protection rules.

Step four: present it clearly in the application

In the budget, show volunteer time as a separate in-kind line. State the number of hours, the rate and the total value. In the narrative, explain what volunteers will do and how their time contributes to the project's outcomes. Avoid simply presenting a large number without context.

A simple table can help:

Volunteer role Hours Rate Value
Community garden volunteers 720 £12 per hour (illustrative) £8,640
Session facilitators 120 £12 per hour (illustrative) £1,440

The figures above are illustrative only. Use the rate required by your funder or a rate you can justify. If the funder asks for evidence, explain that signed registers and a volunteer time ledger are available for inspection.

Common pitfalls to avoid

One of the most frequent mistakes is double counting. The same volunteer hours should not be claimed as match for two different grants unless the funder has explicitly agreed. Another is counting time that is already paid for, such as a staff member's hours, as volunteer time.

Be careful with inflated rates. Claiming a senior professional rate for general volunteering may undermine confidence in the whole application. Similarly, do not describe volunteer time as cash match. It is an in-kind contribution, and the budget should say so clearly.

Poor records are another risk. Retrospective estimates based on memory are difficult to defend if a funder asks for evidence. Inconsistent rates across the application can also raise questions. Finally, remember data protection: volunteers should know why their hours are being recorded and how their information will be used.

A small charity example

Imagine a community garden charity applying for a £15,000 grant to run gardening sessions for isolated older people. Twelve volunteers will support weekly sessions over twenty weeks, averaging three hours each. That is 720 volunteer hours. At an illustrative rate of £12 per hour, the charity can show £8,640 of in-kind match.

The charity keeps a signed register at each session, transfers the hours to a simple spreadsheet and reconciles the total monthly. In the application, it explains that volunteers set up equipment, welcome participants, prepare refreshments and help with light gardening tasks. The budget shows the volunteer time separately from cash costs. The funder can see both the contribution and the evidence behind it.

A manageable discipline

Volunteer time will not replace the need for cash income, and it should not be presented as though it will. But when recorded properly, it gives small charities a credible way to demonstrate community contribution and strengthen a funding bid. The discipline is manageable: confirm the rules, choose a defensible rate, keep a simple ledger and present the figures transparently. In 2026, that small administrative effort can make a meaningful difference to an application.

All Articles

Related Articles

Core Costs, Clear Purpose: Why Unrestricted Funding Deserves a Place in 2026 Grantmaking

Core Costs, Clear Purpose: Why Unrestricted Funding Deserves a Place in 2026 Grantmaking

The Burden of the Big Win: Why Some Grassroots Charities Are Rethinking Large Grants

The Burden of the Big Win: Why Some Grassroots Charities Are Rethinking Large Grants

After the No: Turning a 2026 Funding Rejection into a Stronger Bid

After the No: Turning a 2026 Funding Rejection into a Stronger Bid